Thursday, March 31, 2011

Google Tackles the Like Button With +1

Google expanded its social offerings Wednesday with "+1" - a feature that lets you recommend certain Web sites with the click of a button, much like you might "like" something on Facebook.

Pronounced "plus one," the service will add a small "+1" icon next to search results. If you enjoy a particular site's content, click the icon and when someone in your network searches for something similar, your +1 will show up in their results ("Chloe Albanesius +1'd this").

"The beauty of +1's is their relevance—you get the right recommendations (because they come from people who matter to you), at the right time (when you are actually looking for information about that topic) and in the right format (your search results)," Rob Spiro, a Google product manager, wrote in a blog post.



Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com


Google +1

To activate, you must have a Google profile, where you can view all your +1 activity and delete sites you no longer recommend. At this point, +1 recommendations will be linked via Google connections like chat buddies and contacts, but Google is also considering links via outside sites like Twitter.

Google is slowly rolling out +1, starting with English on Google.com. Soon, the company will allow opt-ins via its experimental search site.

"Initially, +1's will appear alongside search results and ads, but in the weeks ahead they'll appear in many more places (including other Google products and sites across the web)," Spiro wrote.

Facebook added the "like" option in April 2010, which replaced "Become a fan."

Earlier today the Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement with Google regarding its Buzz social-networking service that requires the search giant to develop a comprehensive privacy program and submit to regular audits of its privacy policies. Specifically, Google will be subject to independent privacy audits every two years for the next 20 years. The company is also banned from misrepresenting the privacy of its customers's data, and must obtain consent before sharing user information with third parties.

Monday, March 28, 2011

The iPad is as good an ebook reader as the iPad 2

Five Reasons Not to Buy an iPad 2
Apple has a new iPad on the way, but you've probably gotten pretty chummy with your original model. For a first-generation product, the Apple iPad is a fine tablet that can do tons of different things and hasn't lost any of its functionality in the last few days. Sure, the shiny new iPad 2 is more compact, faster, and adds cameras, but besides that, there's not much more in the way of upgrades. So, should you make the move to the iPad 2?

Well, the new one has a camera, so you can use FaceTime, Photo Booth, and other fun iLife apps that focus on taking photos or videos. If your best friend or favorite relative has an iPhone, iPod touch, or a Mac, this would be the perfect way to get some video calls going without getting a new cell phone. And its faster CPU and graphics processor means it's better suited for the apps and games of the future. Still, there are several good reasons why you shouldn't ditch your old iPad just yet. Here are five of them:

The iPad is as good a media player as the iPad 2
The iPad 2 doesn't increase the resolution or improve the brightness or colors of its display over the first iPad, so as a plain movie viewer, there's no compelling reason to replace your iPad. There are no movies you can watch or songs you can listen to on the iPad 2 that you can't on the original iPad.


Once again, same screen, same ebook reader. The iPad 2 isn't going to display newspapers, magazines, and books any better than the original iPad. At best, the iPad 2 will load large documents like PDFs faster than the iPad, but that's it. Not a good justification to toss out your tablet and spend $500 on a new one.

The iPad can access the same online content as the iPad 2
Again, just like playing local media files and loading ebooks, the iPad 2's additional power won't make online content any smoother or prettier. The iPad can already load Hulu Plus. It can already load Netflix. It can already load the Adult Swim mobile app. What more could you want?





Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com




The iPad can output video to an HDTV just like an iPad 2.
Apple announced the Digital AV Adapter alongside the iPad 2, and showed off its video-mirroring feature as a strong benefit of the new tablet. Unfortunately, video mirroring only works with the iPad 2, but the adapter itself works just fine with the old iPad. You can still use your original iPad as an HDTV-slinging movie player, albeit at 720p compared to the iPad 2's 1080p maximum output resolution. (Update: The Digital AV Adapter only works with the first iPad at up to 720p, while the iPad 2 can output at 1080p through the adapter and supports video mirroring. You can still send video to your HDTV through your original iPad, but it will be slightly lower resolution. Whether that's a deal-breaker is up to you.)

You'll still be able to use GarageBand on the iPad
Next to iMovie, GarageBand is the biggest new app Apple announced alongside the iPad 2. However, it will run on the original iPad. Yes, the iPad 2's faster, but you won't need that power to cut some fresh tracks in the iOS version of GarageBand.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Legal considerations regarding smartphone use for business

Businesses can’t do much these days without considering the potential legal ramifications. Large corporations will have in-house attorneys and entire staffs to advise them about legal questions, but smaller companies may not always run everything past their lawyers (often because they’re struggling with tight budgets). Here are some legal issues that might come up in regard to your own or your employees’ use of smartphones and other cell phones when conducting business.

Note: I am a small business owner with many years of experience, but I am not an attorney, so nothing in this post should be construed as legal advice.

Purchase or reimburse?
In many businesses, employees are mobile — they work at customers’ sites, they go out in the field to procure materials or solicit new clients, and they’re expected to be on call nights and weekends. If your company is considering whether to provide employees with mobile phones or reimburse them for all or part of their personal cell phone expenses, you’ll want to consider the cost of each option. It makes sense to assume that the company will have more control over the phone if you purchase it in the company’s name, pay the monthly bills directly, and issue it to the employee. You should consult your attorney as to how this decision will affect legal issues that might arise regarding the use of the phone.







Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com





The Future of Mobile Printing

Print from a Smartphone, from a Tablet, from anywhere!
Learn More »

One consideration is that if the company purchases the smartphone, it owns the phone number assigned to that device. If the employee leaves the company, that phone number can be given to another employee. If the employee owns the phone and leaves the company, customers and other business contacts who had that phone number will no longer be able to use it to get in touch with the company.

You should also keep in mind that state laws vary widely, and employers and employees may have rights in one location that they don’t have in another.

Dedicated to business?
If the company buys and issues the phone and pays the phone bill, will employees be required to use their phones for business use only, and carry a second phone for their own personal use? If so, you should have a written policy stipulating this, and employees should sign an agreement to abide by the policy when they’re issued their phones.

Many companies tolerate a certain amount of personal use of the company-owned phone. If you decide to allow it, your policy should specify that employees will be required to pay for any services they access on the phone that cost extra, such as text messages, ringtone downloads, entertainment services, and navigation and mobile hotspot services (unless you pay for those so they can use them for business purposes).

Who owns the data?
An important consideration that you’ll want to clarify when you issue phones or reimburse employees is who owns the data stored on the devices. Smartphones are really miniature computers and can have all the same sorts of data on them as resides on a desktop or a laptop computer (email messages, customer contact information, company documents and spreadsheets, and so forth), but almost always in the case of employee-owned phones and often in the case of employer-owned phones, the users will also store personal data on their phones. Who owns what?

If you’re in a regulated industry, such as healthcare or financial services, it’s important to remember that you may be mandated to protect the confidentiality of personal data pertaining to clients. If you own the phones, you can select the models that are most secure, and ensure that they are running the most up-to-date version of the smartphone operating system. In addition, you can enforce encryption of the data stored on them.

Management issues
What if the company buys and issues the smartphones, but when an employee quits the job or is terminated, the employee refuses to return the phone? If the phone is in the company’s name, you should be able to contact the carrier and have the phone deactivated, and the number reassigned to someone else in the company.

Can you have the carrier use the phone’s GPS functionality (or the cell tower triangulation method) to track down the user and retrieve the phone? What legal action can you take against the employee? Can you file theft charges, or would you have to take the former employee to civil court to get a judgment requiring the phone to be returned to you? If you merely reimburse an employee’s mobile phone expenses, you wouldn’t have to worry about any of these issues since the employee would keep the phone. However, you still need to think about whether and how you can make the former employee remove company data from the phone. Can you require the phone’s storage be wiped (factory reset) to ensure that no company data is left on the device? If you have the technological capability to remotely wipe the phone, is it legal for you to do when the phone is owned by the employee?

Again, these are questions to ask your attorney in advance, and to take into consideration when you write your company policies governing cell phone use.

Employee monitoring
Another issue that you may want to consult your attorney about is whether you can legally track the employee’s movements via the company cell phone. If you do track the employee, do you have to inform the individual that you’re doing it? Can you track the employee during off-duty hours when they are carrying the company phone or only during business hours?

Can you require employees to keep their phones on all the time when they’re away from the office? If you do, will you have to pay them “standby pay” for that time? It’s technologically possible to turn a cell phone on remotely; is it legal for you to do this if an employee turns the phone off, and you want to get in touch and/or track their location?

Software is available for several phone platforms that can be installed on a cell phone to allow you to listen to and/or record conversations and remotely read call logs, email messages, and SMS messages. Is it legal for you to use such software to monitor your employees’ company-issued phones? Do you have to notify them that you’re doing so? These are questions you need to ask your attorney.

Liability issues
Another question to ask your attorney: What is the company’s liability if an employee uses a company-owned cell phone as a platform for launching an attack, hacking into a network or computer, downloading child pornography, harassing someone, or committing other illegal acts? Could a wronged party sue the company as well as the individual employee, claiming that by using company equipment, the employee was acting as a representative of the company?

It’s important for you to put policies in place that specifically prohibit employees from using company-issued phones for any illegal activities, or actions that would be likely to result in a civil suit. This helps protect the company by providing tangible evidence that the employee was acting outside the scope of employment.

What if the police need to seize the phone as evidence of a crime? The company may lose the use of it for a very long time as the case winds its way through the court system.

What if you purchase and issue a phone to an employee and it’s defective and overheats or explodes, causing an injury? Could the employee sue you for issuing the defective phone? These may seem like far out scenarios, but it pays to be prepared for every eventuality.

Summary
This blog post is meant to serve as a starting point regarding some of the types of issues that can have legal ramifications, and some of the questions that you need to ask when you decide to provide (or reimburse for) employee smartphones. The article’s purpose is not to provide answers to your legal questions — only an attorney versed in your locality’s applicable laws can do that for you.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Windows Phone 7 Copy and Paste Hands On

Microsoft on Tuesday began to roll out Windows Phone 7 update 7.0.7390.0, which finally includes the long-awaited copy and paste function. Sure, it's not particularly groundbreaking, but it's certainly a nice feature to have. We still haven't received the WP7 update on any of our phones in the PCMag Labs, but the HTC Arrive shipped with this latest version of the OS already loaded, so I decided to test out the copy and paste function on that.

Copy and pasting on a Windows Phone 7 was, well, copy and pasting on a Windows Phone 7. It works more or less as you'd expect—extremely similar to the copy and paste function on iOS and many Android devices.

To test it, I pulled up a Wikipedia entry for Rebecca Black and attempted to copy the first sentence. All I had to do was tap the first word in the sentence to activate the copy function. After that word was highlighted, I was able to drag on it from either side to highlight the rest of the text I wanted to copy.





Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com




A copy icon automatically appears above the highlighted text, and tapping on it copied the material I had selected. I was then able to sign into my mail account and click a paste icon that appeared when I began to enter text. This pasted everything I had copied right into the body of my email. It was fast, easy, and intuitive.

So far it doesn't appear that you can copy anything less than a full word. For instance, if I only wanted to copy "Rebecca Bla," I still would've had to copy "Rebecca Black," and then modify it manually from there. This feature is available on the copy and paste functions for the iOS, Android, and BB6 phones I tested.

I would say that the new WP7 copy and paste experience is comparable to that on other smartphones. To try it out, I tested the function on an Apple iPhone 4, HTC EVO 4G, and a BlackBerry Bold. Of the four, the BlackBerry Bold presented the most significantly different experience, if only because it lacks a touch screen. But overall, I found it rather easy to copy and paste across all four smartphone operating systems.

To see the function in action, take a look at the slideshow above.

Sunday, March 13, 2011

How To Create SymLink in Windows

Symlinks let you define soft/hard links to files/directories placed in different locations. Essentially, they are like windows shortcuts (a.k.a. soft symlinks) and the other type is something in-between the two: shortcuts and Original Files/directories. You can use HardLinks as an original file/folder, transparently.

Linux/Unix has inbuilt feature of creating symlinks using “ln” command. On older Windows versions, there is no inbuilt utility that does that. However, on Windows Vista, Windows 7 you can use a command line utility called “mklink”. But not everyone likes the command line that’s why there is a GUI-based tool for this: Symlinker.




Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com


symlink windows

There are several Use cases for employing Hard symlinks. e.g. when you are running out of diskspace on your c:\ drive and certain programs still force you to install new software in c:\ drive (most microsoft, Google products do that) you can create a directory symlink and point it to another drive, save the buck. Another reason would be to move the caches, libraries (media player, iTunes songs lib), indexes (picasa photocache, search indexes, google desktop indexes) which take a large amount of disk space on your C:\drive.

There could be n number of other reasons, and this tool always comes handy.

Download Symlinker

To use this properly, here is some background on types of SymLinks:

Soft Link
A soft link is essentially a shortcut to a file or folder –it won’t pretend its part of the filesystem. You can still directly reference or open a file with the symlinked path, and it mostly works.

Hard Link
A hard link directly points to the file, and acts to the operating system as if it is the file itself. You’ll want to use this option the majority of the time if you are trying to fake an application’s directory just like the case described earlier.

Using Symlinks for a Network Share
You can even use Hardlinks/softlinks for pointing to Network shares thereby giving you a Mounted drive.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Vista marks end of planned software

Big software releases like Windows Vista mark the end of “planned software” for the industry, according to Red Hat chief executive Jim Whitehurst.

Speaking at a forum in Singapore on Friday, Whitehurst said the proprietary, “top-down, planned” software-development model, characteristic of closed-source companies, is coming to an end. Such a model is demonstrated by Vista and the number of bugs within it, he said.




Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com



Whitehurst claimed that there are “half the number of bugs in Linux per thousand lines” compared to the Microsoft operating system, because of the open-source, collaborative model.

Vulnerability-research company Secunia released a report earlier this year stating there were more flaws reported last year for Red Hat operating systems than for Microsoft operating systems. This was denied by a Red Hat security team member.

Whitehurst explained his position in an interview with ZDNet Asia, saying closed-source models are hampered by limits on the amount of planning that can be done during the development process to foresee all the roadblocks that might arise. “If software gets too big, it cannot be organized. This is an indicator of what can be planned,” he said.

The Linux stack, on the other hand, “had to be modular” because of how fast development efforts on it spread. Development from the global open-source community happens in tandem and at a rate not pre-planned by a “monolithic vendor”, Whitehurst said.

However, because of the modular development model and the number of parties checking for errors, open-source software comes out with fewer errors and is more organized, he explained. Whitehurst attempted to explain the appeal of open-source software’s participatory “community” model by likening open source to US reality TV competition American Idol and closed products to US pop star Britney Spears.

Of American Idol, he said the record studios were able to spend less to market the eventual winner because audience participation accurately showed which singer was preferred before the competition was over.

Britney Spears, on the other hand, as a “product of millions of dollars in investment” is not a sure bet when each record is released to the public, because the marketing surrounding her was pre-planned and excluded the public, he said.

Whitehurst said during his presentation that development through the open-source community is also faster and often more precise in terms of what customers need, because enterprises are able to contribute code that they have written for their pain points back to the community. He contrasted this with the traditional proprietary method of “listening to customers” and writing code based on that interpretation.

“Linux functionality leapt forward because customers could develop what they wanted, and Red Hat could help share it,” he said.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Windows Strategy Guru Leaving Microsoft

Mike Nash, Microsoft's corporate vice president of Windows platform strategy, will leave the company in a "couple" of weeks, a Microsoft representative confirmed Wednesday.

Microsoft did not say where Nash was headed, but reports said that he will go to Amazon to work on the Kindle e-book reader.



Unlimited life Microsoft MCTS Training, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com


"We can confirm that Mike Nash is leaving Microsoft in a couple weeks," the Microsoft representative said. "In his 19 years, Mike made an impact in number of key roles at the company. We appreciate his service and wish him well."

Nash is another member of the Microsoft Windows team to depart the company, following the departure of Bill Veghte last month. Veghte, the former senior vice president of Microsoft's global Windows business, lost the job to Steven Sinofsky, who oversaw the Office business, last July.